Undoubtedly, President Bola Tinubu’s announcement of a 30-day youth conference in his Independence Day broadcast is a stark example of how government initiatives can be nothing more than symbolic gestures, devoid of substance and utility. Billed as a major step to engage with youths, this conference is yet another in a long line of political distractions designed to create the illusion of action without addressing the underlying life and death challenges facing Nigeria’s teeming youth population. Rather than invest in genuine, long-term solutions, Tinubu has opted for an expensive, time-consuming spectacle that serves little practical purpose, with no redeeming value. Youth unemployment sits at a staggering 33%, and many young people are leaving the country for greener pastures abroad. Rather than address this brain drain through targeted policies, at a time Nigeria is facing very serious challenges from rising inflation, widespread insecurity, and economic hardship, it is baffling that Tinubu would dedicate 30 days to a public relations gimmick. Nigerian youth need jobs, not empty rhetoric. They need investments in education and vocational training, not another conference to discuss their problems. A 30-day event does nothing to alleviate the daily struggles young Nigerians face. It is an insult and a disservice to the youths that conference claims to empower.

 

A youth conference, in and of itself, is not inherently a bad idea. In theory, it could serve as a platform for constructive dialogue between government officials and young people. However, the reality of Nigeria’s socio-economic landscape makes such a prolonged event seem disconnected from the urgent needs of the youths. Nigeria’s youth are grappling with unemployment, inadequate education, poverty, and growing disillusionment with the political elite. Yet, instead of channeling resources into tangible improvements like job creation, education reform, or access to healthcare, Tinubu has chosen to focus on an abstract conference that offers no concrete path toward solving these problems. Tinubu’s government is investing time and public funds into a conference that will not yield any lasting results. Coming on the heels of the August #EndBadGovernance protests against economic hardship, such a lengthy conference feels more like a cheap publicity stunt than a genuine attempt to engage with Nigerian youths. Worse still, it may end up as yet another token measure of appeasement designed to deflect from the government’s failure to engage meaningfully over serious socio-economic issues 

 

Besides the vagueness of the conference’s agenda that is fueling skepticism, a 30-day conference in a country with shambolic basic infrastructure will be a logistics nightmare. How practical is it to hold a conference for a month? What criteria will be used to select attendees, and will these attendees genuinely represent the interests of the youth, or will they be handpicked members of political youth wings or individuals with connections to the corridors of power as is so often the case? Who will foot the bill for transportation, accommodation, and food for participants? Most importantly, what exactly will it accomplish that has not already been discussed? Without clear objectives, and measurable outcomes, this event becomes little more than a political theatre of the absurd – an opportunity for government officials to pat themselves on the back for engaging with the youth, while real action is conspicuously absent. A better approach for President Tinubu would be to focus on taking immediate and concrete steps to address the specific grievances of the youths over the next few months.

 

The 10-day #EndBadGovernance protests, drew attention to the country’s protracted economic woes, corruption, and lack of accountability. With the proposed conference, Tinubu is trying to appease young Nigerians with a token gesture rather than tackle the root causes of their discontent. This clearly, is a waste of time, and resources. The funds allocated to organizing and running the event could be directed toward programs with immediate impact. For instance, job creation initiatives like expanding access to credit for small businesses, investing in infrastructure projects that create employment opportunities, or launching nationwide vocational training programs would offer far more tangible benefits. The logistics of holding such a long conference – venues, transportation, security, accommodations, and feeding are costly. These resources could be better spent elsewhere, given Nigeria’s fragile economic state.

 

Moreover, this conference is yet another example of a top-down approach to governance that fails to truly engage with Nigeria’s youth in a meaningful way. Instead of consulting with grassroots youth organizations, student unions, or communities to understand their specific needs, the government has chosen to organize a grand event that serves more as a platform for politicians than for young Nigerians. This lack of real engagement underscores a failure to appreciate the complexity of the challenges facing the nation’s youth. This conference is a clear attempt to placate growing youth dissatisfaction with the government. Over the past decade, Nigerian youths have increasingly expressed their frustrations through protests, online activism, and social movements like #EndSARS, and #EndBadGovernance which highlighted police brutality and government indifference to the needs of young people. Instead of taking these concerns seriously and enacting structural reforms, Tinubu seems to believe that a conference will somehow mollify this anger.

 

The move is reminiscent of past efforts by Nigerian politicians to diffuse public anger through symbolic gestures. However, history has shown these tactics rarely succeed. The youth are increasingly aware of the disconnect between government rhetoric and reality. They are not likely to be swayed by another empty promise, especially when their lived experiences continue to be marked by hardship and neglect. True engagement requires reaching out to the disenfranchised, the unemployed, and the activists who have been calling for change for years. These are voices that matter most, but will obviously be ignored because their daily realities are far removed from the privileged few who will attend the conference. In comparison to successful youth engagement models elsewhere, Tinubu’s youth conference is even more underwhelming. Many nations have invested in long-term programs to integrate youths into socio-economic and political life. Countries like South Korea and Singapore have emphasized skills training, entrepreneurship, and tech-driven initiatives to ensure their youth are ready for challenges of the 21st-century economy.

 

In contrast, Tinubu seems stuck in the past, relying on conferences and summits as a means to engage with young people without providing the resources or platforms they need to succeed. If Nigeria truly wants to harness the potential of its youth, it must move beyond the outdated model of political theater and start investing in real opportunities for its younger generations. In the final analysis, Tinubu’s 30-day youth conference is little more than a meaningless spectacle; a waste of time, resources, and political capital. At a time when Nigerian youths are crying out for real change, for jobs, for security, and for a future they can believe in, the government has responded with an event that promises much but will almost certainly deliver little. It is a profound misunderstanding of what Nigerian youths really need. This is not leadership.